Szerkesztővita:Billinghurst
Szerkesztések visszavonása
Miért vontad vissza a szerkesztéseket és miért jelölted őket vandalizmusnak? – 195.209.107.148 (vita) 2015. november 28., 15:09 (CET)
A hivatkozásokat a horvát autópályadíj kalkulátoromra miért törölted? Nem releváns?
Szia!
A hivatkozásokat a horvát autópályadíj kalkulátoromra miért törölted? Nem releváns?
Erre gondolok:
Köszi. – Aláíratlan hozzászólás, szerzője Janositibor (vitalap | szerkesztései) 2018. március 9., 15:29 (CET)
- A couple of things. 1) This is an encyclopaedia, and your toll calculator is neither a reliable source, a relevant external link, nor pertinent to an encyclopaedia. 2) Your continued addition of links to a site where you have a conflict of interest. Please stop your addition of a link that is not encyclopaedic and to which you have an interest. Each wikipedia will have information pages about each of these subjects so please read them. Thanks. Billinghurst vita 2018. március 9., 22:08 (CET)
Thanks for your answer!
My answers based on information available on the following pages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_Simple_Rules_for_Editing_Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam
1.a Not a reliable source: I agree. My site is not a reliable source by definition. But on this topic there is only one reliable source: HAC.hr. If it is a strict rule, no another external link would be acceptable. There are lot of links to "not reliable sites" on the discussed pages, so it is not a strict rule in this case.
1.b Not a relevant external link: In my opinion you are wrong. It is relevant.
1.c Not pertinent to an encyclopaedia: I disagree. On the referred url you can find useful, unique and true information.
2. Conflict of interest: It is possible that you are right and the repeated sending was spam activity, so I wont insert the same link more than once. "Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances" I think the unique (and valid) content is the typical example of the mentioned circumstances. Accordingly to the 5th pillar "The principles and spirit matter more than literal wording" a link to the given language version of my site is appropriate. Please stop your removing of links.
Regards, – Aláíratlan hozzászólás, szerzője Janositibor (vitalap | szerkesztései) 2018. március 10., 15:33 (CET)
- When you are only adding the links to your site, and on multiple wikis, then it is a clear conflict of interest; so please look at those pages which give guidance on managing conflict of interest.
- Wikipedias are not directories of links, and not here to provide tourist information, or the like. There exists the sister sites Wikivoyage that exist to cover such information, not the wikipedias. In what printed encyclopaedia have you seen, or would you expect to see a link or a reference, to a toll fee calculator? That in part is the test that I am applying here.
- The authoritative site presumably is hac.hr, so it is what should be used, not your interpretation of that.
- You can see luxo:89.133.82.181 for one set of your edits that shows that your focus is aimed at your website, not on improving our sites. So if you think that I am overly harsh in imposing my opinion over yours, then utilise the available processes, not simply reimpose your edits where you have a clear conflict of interest. Billinghurst vita 2018. március 11., 01:05 (CET)
Cerdanya
Hi Billinghurst. Why did you remove this link from the article? You marked it as spam, however it is present in a number of wikis, e.g. enwiki, eswiki, frwiki, etc. Looking at the web page it is not obvious that it is a spam. Csigabi
itt a házam 2018. december 21., 21:51 (CET)
- Hi @Csigabi: it is classic conflict of interest link spam. Have a look at m:User:COIBot/XWiki/cerdanya.eu, and yes it is at other wikis, and it shouldn't be at those wikis either. It gets into one wiki and propagates outwards. It would seem appropriate for the wikivoyages like hu:voy: if the relevant article is there. Billinghurst vita 2018. december 22., 02:55 (CET)
- This person has made 28 additions, all to articles and just adding their url, adding a EU language link to a tourist site to WPs. I was working though the bottom of the list for the overnight additions, and I set aside the page to come back to remainder later, which I have been doing. There are better links to Cerdanya local region that are government and generally more language appropriate, and have not been added by this person. Naturally I am not trying override any local opinion of a valued and valid link. Billinghurst vita 2018. december 22., 03:17 (CET)
Thanks for the explanation. I was just puzzled why you had picked huwiki out of a bunch of wikis. I can see now that in the meantime you have deleted the link from other wikis, too. Cheers and merry Christmas. Csigabiitt a házam 2018. december 22., 10:42 (CET)
Szaúd-Arábia
Why [1]? It looks like to me as a correct development of the article with source.– Szilas vita 2020. szeptember 28., 08:19 (CEST)
- @Szilas: This user has been using what seems to be a machine translation and adding the same text across multiple wikis. It isn't a reliable source, so its addition is dubious and most likely a conflict of interest, see m:User:COIBot/XWiki/visa-saudi-arabia.com. If you think that it is legitimate, then feel free to undo my edit, this is your community's decision to make, and you will get no complaints from me. Billinghurst vita 2020. szeptember 28., 08:42 (CEST)
Ok, it is not that important to me, only a question.– Szilas vita 2020. szeptember 28., 10:35 (CEST)
Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier
You say it is deleted at major wikis. Actually, it exists since 2019 on the German Wikipedia. It does not even have a warning template about notability or deletion. On the French, it exists since 2018 but it has a warning template about notability. (Yes, I know that it does not imply that it was never deleted.) Alfa-ketosav vita 2021. július 9., 07:08 (CEST)
- @Alfa-ketosav: Did I miss deWP? Oops, now fixed. I know that it is an imperfect means to put before communities, however, doing 20+ local language deletion requests is a rather significant undertaking, takes sufficient time just placing them as I did. I am not going to quibble about the use and implied or non-implied words of English, if it was misleading, then my apologies. I was trying to indicate that there had been deletions at large wikis, and still existing at the smaller wikis, and all by the same IP address and sockpuppets. It was an issue raised with stewards and global sysops due to the nature of the creations. Billinghurst vita 2021. július 9., 07:49 (CEST)
YES, it was deceptive and manipulative. Apologies are NOT accepted because far from regret, you keep doing the same. Confirmed administrators of small Wikis (as you call them), are deleting your (misleading) label and you insist over and over again putting it back. That there are deletions in large wikis does not mean that it has to be removed from smaller wikis, each wiki has its editors and administrators. – Aláíratlan hozzászólás, szerzője 85.84.0.104 (vitalap | szerkesztései)
- <sigh> I have brought the issue to communities as was determined when it was raised with stewards and global sysops. I have no conflict of interest. I have no particular interest in the article, I did not create it, I did not have disputed edits. You have the conflict of interest, where it is tagged you have removed that tag; you have no openness about the person and have created the article on dozens of wikis. So you can stop your mistruths. I operate openly, I don't create sockpuppets, I don't hop around IPs. If I haven't clearly followed a rule of the community, or where my statement has lacked clarity and has caused a issue, then I will apologise as it is the decent thing to do. Billinghurst vita 2021. augusztus 11., 02:42 (CEST)
You have not brought the issue to the communities as determined when it was raised with the administrators and global sysops in the Radio Studio 54 Network article. It has not clearly followed a community rule with 150 articles created by the same editor "Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino. [[2]], [[3]]. We don't see a single tag on these 150 wikis. If you have a conflict of interest. If you have a particular interest in deleting this article and not others Radio Studio 54 Network